HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14963 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Ritika Singh, learned counsel for the respondent nos.2-4 whose vakalatnama filed today is taken on record. 2. The present petition has been filed with the following prayer: "(i) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties to grant the benefit of second ACP Scheme (Assured Career Progression) to the petitioner with effect from 12.12.2018, the date when the petitioner became eligible on completion of 16 years of service, and fix the pay of the petitioner accordingly. (ii) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties to grant all consequential benefits to the petitioner after the pay fixation. (iii) Any other order which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit, just and proper may also be passed in favour of the petitioner. (iv) Allow the rit petition in favor of the petitioner with costs." 3. After arguing at length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the ends of justice would sub-serve if, this Court allows the petitioner to move a fresh representation before the respondent no.2 and he may be Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pradeep Kumar Rai, Avi Mukteshwar Nath Singh, Prakarsh Pandey, Praveen Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Ritika Singh, Shishir Jain Manendra Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Public Works Deptt. Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) directed direct to consider and decide the same, within the time fixed by this Court. 4. Learned counsel for the respondents has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 5. Be that as it may, without entering into merits of the issue, I hereby dispose off this petition finally at the admission stage giving liberty to the petitioner to prefer a fresh representation before the respondent no.3- Managing Director, UP Rajkiya Nirman Nigam Ltd., Lucknow ventilating his grievance taking all pleas and grounds which are available with him enclosing therewith the copy of his earlier representation, if any, which are necessary for disposal of the representation within a period of 15 days from today and if such representation is preferred by the petitioner within the aforesaid stipulated time, the authority concerned shall consider and dispose of the same strictly, by speaking and reasoned order in accordance with law after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, if it is so required, with expedition preferably, within a further period of six weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and the decision thereof shall be intimated to the petitioner, forthwith. December 19, 2025 V. Sinha WRIA No. 14963 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench