ANZAR KHAN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
A482/9514/2025 · 2025-11-17
Brij Raj Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 186930 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 186930 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9514 of 2025 Court No. - 16 HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material available on record. 2. This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicants for quashing the impugned chargesheet dated 15.04.2024 under Sections 147, 323, 504, 506, 427, 452, 327, I.P.C. and Section 3(a), 3(b) Medical Staff Protection Act, related to P.S. Hasanganj, Lucknow, as well as the summoning order dated 14.05.2024 passed in Criminal Case No. 45893 of 2024, Crime No. 0258 of 2022 under Sections 147, 323, 504, 506, 427, 452, 327, I.P.C. and Section 3(a), 3(2) Medical Staff Protection Act, related to P.S. Hasanganj, Lucknow, in respect of applicants (contained as Annexure Nos. 1 and 2 to the application). 3. After arguing the matter up to some length, learned counsel for the applicants submit that he does not want to press this application on merit and he confines his prayer only to the extent that applicants may be permitted to move discharge application through counsel and suitable directions may be issued for expeditious disposal of the same. 4. Learned A.G.A. has no objection in grant of aforesaid prayer. 5. In view of above, it is provided that applicants are permitted to move their discharge application through counsel within two weeks from today and in case any such application are being filed, same shall be heard and decided expeditiously, say within four weeks thereafter, after hearing the parties, in accordance with law, by means of a reasoned and speaking order. 6. Till the aforesaid period of six weeks and during pendency of discharge application, no coercive steps shall be taken against the applicants in the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Atul Kumar Mishra, Ashish Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Anzar Khan .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
aforesaid case. 7. In case of failure on the part of applicants in moving the discharge application within the aforesaid period, they will not be entitled to the benefit of this order. 8. With above directions, this application stands disposed of.
November 17, 2025 A.Nigam A482 No. 9514 of 2025 2 (Brij Raj Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench