KUSHAL CHAND AND ANOTHER v. THE STATE OF HP AND ANOTHER
CWP/10492/2025 · 2025-07-01
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18693 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18693 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
CWP Nos.10492 of 2025
Decided on: 1st July, 2025 _________________________________________________________________ Kushal Chand & Anr.
....Petitioners
Versus
State of H.P. & Anr.
…Respondents _________________________________________________________________ Coram
Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
1 Whether approved for reporting? _________________________________________________________________ For the petitioners: Mr. Virender Singh, Advocate .
For the respondents: Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
Notice. Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan, learned Deputy Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents.
2.
Petitioners are serving in the respondent- Revenue Department and have prayed for direction to the respondents to grant them work charge status from the date they completed eight years of service with all incidental benefits.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the issue involved in the writ petition and the relief prayed for
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes
- 2 - by the petitioners is now covered by the decision rendered by the Hon’ble Apex Court in The State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. Versus Surajmani & Anr.2. The respondent- Department was also the appellant before the Hon’ble Supreme Court in some of the connected matters. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioners would be satisfied in case the respondents are directed to examine their cases in light of the aforesaid judgment within a fixed time schedule. Learned Deputy Advocate General is not averse to this prayer.
4.
Having regard to the afore-submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of with direction to the respondents/ competent authority to consider and decide the cases of the petitioners in accordance with law laid down in Surajmani2 and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within six weeks from today. Copy of the order so passed, be also communicated to the petitioners.
2 Civil Appeal No.1595 of 2025, decided alongwith connected civil appeals on 06.02.2025
- 3 -
Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also to stand disposed of.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua July 1, 2025
Judge R.Atal