SMT. SULEKHA and 3 OTHERS v. RAMESH CHANDRA PORWAL and 3 OTHERS
FAFOD/1007/2016 · 2025-12-09
Prashant Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 186920 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 186920 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER DEFECTIVE No. - 1007 of 2016 Court No. - 19 HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J.
1. Case called out in the revised call.
2. No one appeared on behalf of the appellant(s) to press this appeal nor there is any request to adjourn or pass over the case.
3. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. December 9, 2025 Raj Versus Counsel for Appellant(s) : Manish Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : Mrs. Pooja Arora (Prashant Kumar,J.) Smt. Sulekha And 3 Others .....Appellant(s) Ramesh Chandra Porwal And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench