SMT. RUKMINI @ SANDHYA and ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME. LKO and ANOTHER
A482/1977/2020 · 2025-12-05
Rajeev Bharti
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 186919 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 186919 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 1977 of 2020 Court No. - 23 HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J.
1. At the very outset, learned counsel for the applicants informed the Court that proceeding before the trial court has concluded, hence the instant application has been rendered infructuous and the same may be dismissed as such.
2. In view of the above, the instant application is dismissed as infructuous. December 5, 2025 Anand/- Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Pramod Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Santosh Kumar Gupta (Rajeev Bharti,J.) Smt. Rukmini @ Sandhya And Another .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home. Lko And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- ANAND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench