VIPIN KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.
/11328/2025 · 2025-11-20
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 186903 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 186903 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11328 of 2025
Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.464 of 2025, under Section 115(2), 352, 351(3), 105 BNS, P.S. Kotwali Dehat, District Hardoi. 3. In terms of the FIR it was alleged that on 02.09.2025 the applicant had beaten up his own father with the use of Lathi, Danda etc., as well as his younger brother which resulted in substantial injuries. It was stated that a dispute had occurred with regard to partition of the property. Postmortem report on record indicates presence of four injuries being on the nose, chest, ankle joint and left foot. Cause of death was shock and was not linked to the injuries. 4. In the light of the said, learned counsel for the applicant draws my attention to the statement of the witness, wife of the deceased, who had stated that in between the two brothers, land disputes were existent since long and in that connection, the applicant had allegedly hit the husband of the said witness which resulted in substantial injuries. 5. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 6. Considering the reason of the dispute being a land dispute and the nature of the injuries which are not on the vital parts and are not linked with the death, the applicant who has no criminal antecedents and is in custody since Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Narvind Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Vipin Kumar .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
05.09.2025 is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 7.
Let the applicant Vipin Kumar be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 20, 2025 nishant BAIL No. 11328 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench