1 2025:CGHC:8590 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MA No. 22 of 2025 1. Smt. Sita Devi, Wd/o Lt. Roshanlal Bondiya, Aged About 70 Years, R/o Gandhiganj, Raigarh, Tahsil & District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. 2. Ashish, S/o Lt. Roshanlal Bondiya, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Gandhiganj, Raigarh, Tahsil & District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. 3. Rajat, S/o Lt. Roshanlal Bondiya, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Gandhiganj, Raigarh, Tahsil & District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. 4. Smt. Susheela Goyal, D/o Lt. Roshanlal Bondiya, W/o Ajay Goyal, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Kharsiya, Tahsil Kharsiya, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. 5. Smt. Kiran, D/o Lt. Roshanlal Bondiya, W/o Jugalkishor, Aged About 44 Years, R/o Chandrapur, Tahsil Dabhra, District Sakti, Chhattisgarh. 6. Smt. Manju, D/o Lt. Roshanlal Bondiya, W/o Nandkishor, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Village Salar, Tahsil Sarangarh, District Sarangarh-Bilaigarh, Chhattisgarh. 7. Smt. Krishna, D/o Lt. Roshanlal Bondiya, W/o Purshottam, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Pathalgaon, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. 8. Smt. Priti Garg, D/o Lt. Roshanlal Bondiya, W/o Arun Garg, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Pathalgaon, Tahsil Pathalgaon, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. ... Appellants versus 1. Ramavtar, S/o Lt. Jailal Bondiya, Aged About 65 Years, R/o Pratapgarh, Tahsil Sitarpur, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh. 2. Gopal, S/o Lt. Roshanlal Bondiya, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Behind Gandhiganj, Raigarh, Tahsil & District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. 3. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Collector, Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents (Cause title taken from Case Information System) For Appellants : Mr. Akash Shrivastava, Advocate. For State/respondent No.3 : Ms. Mukta Tripathi, P.L. DEEPTI JHA NIRALA Digitally signed by DEEPTI JHA NIRALA Date: 2025.02.19 16:33:51 +0530 2 Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi Order on Board 19/02/2025 1. Heard. 2. Learned counsel for the appellants seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this appeal with liberty to file writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. 3. State counsel has no objection to allow the limited prayer made by the counsel for the appellants. 4. Permission is granted. 5. Accordingly, instant appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. 6. Registry is directed to return the certified copy of the impugned order (Annexure-P/1), after retaining photocopy of the same in the record. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge