JANARDAN PRASAD v. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION, PRATAPGARH AND OTHERS
WRIB/1108/2025 · 2025-12-05
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 186899 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 186899 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - B No. - 1108 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
1. Heard Sri Dhirendra Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for respondent no. 1.
2. In the light of proposed order notice to private respondents is dispensed with. Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record.
3. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that against order dated 25.11.2020, passed by the Settlement Officer (Consolidation), the petitioner has preferred revision before the Deputy Director of Consolidation, which is numbered as Suit No. 2020530257000035 - Janardan Vs. Neelkanth, which is pending consideration.
4. It has been next submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that an application for interim relief has also been filed by the petitioner, on which no orders have been passed and prayer has been made that there is urgency in the matter inasmuch as the private respondents are alienating the property.
5. In the light of above, liberty is granted to the petitioner to move appropriate application giving necessary reason for urgency before the Deputy Director of Consolidation. In case any such application is filed within next two weeks, the Deputy Director of Consolidation shall proceed to consider and decide the same within two weeks thereafter by means of reasoned and speaking order. In case Deputy Director of Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dhirendra Kumar Mishra, Manoj Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Janardan Prasad .....Petitioner(s) Deputy Director Of Consolidation, Pratapgarh And Others .....Respondent(s)
Consolidation finds that there is urgency in the matter, he shall proceed to consider and decide the interim relief application of the petitioner with expedition, in accordance with law after giving full opportunity of hearing to all the parties concerned.
6. Subject to above directions present writ petition stands disposed of. December 5, 2025 A. Verma WRIB No. 1108 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench