HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1929 of 2025 Court No. - 15 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. Present anticipatory bail application has been filed seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 0188 of 2025 under Sections 2(30), 317(2), 338, 336(3), 340(2) BNS, Police Station-Madhoganj, District-Hardoi. Submission of the learned counsel for the applicant is that applicant has not been caught from spot. Name of the applicant has surfaced in the confessional statement of co-accused in police custody. There is no recovery from the applicant. The recovery of Rs.5,07,024/- cash, one silver payal set and motorcycle number plate is from the co-accused. The applicant has explained criminal history in para 26 of the bail application. In case crime Nos.0185 of 2025 and 0161 of 2025, the applicant has been framed by the police through present case crime No.188 of 2025. In case crime No.492 of 2012 under section 3/4 U.P. Control of Goondas Act and case crime No.625 of 2012, the applicant has submitted bond and time for enforcement of this order has been elapsed. In another case crime No.91 of 2011 under section 307 I.P.C., the applicant has already been acquitted vide order, Annexure No.5. The applicant has no concern with case crime No.093 of 2011 under sections 18/21/08 of NDPS Act. The applicant has been enlarged on bail in case crime No.70 of 2024 vide order, Annexure Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ashutosh Kumar Shukla, Shreshth Srivastava, Trisha Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Salman @ Salman Khan .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) No.6. Learned counsel for the applicant further submits that the applicant is willing to cooperate with the investigation. The co-accused Roshan has been enlarged on anticipatory bail vide order dated 27.11.2025 passed in Anticipatory Bail No.1848 of 2025. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. However, he could not dispute the submission of the learned counsel for the applicant. Considered the aforesaid and perused the record. On due consideration of facts that there appears to be no recovery, name of applicant is surfaced in the confessional statement in police custody, applicant has explained the criminal history, investigation is going on, bail order of the co-accused Roshan, so also the undertaking given on his behalf to cooperate in the investigation, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be released on anticipatory bail subject to his cooperation in the investigation. In view of the above, it is provided that in the event of arrest, the applicant shall be released on anticipatory bail in the aforesaid Case Crime number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting officer/investigating officer/S.H.O. concerned with the following conditions:- The applicant shall report to the investigating officer within twenty days from today. He shall cooperate in the investigation and he will not influence the witness. The accused-applicant will remain present as and when the arresting officer/I.O./S.H.O. concerned call(s) for investigation/interrogation. The applicant shall not leave India without previous permission of the Court. The application is allowed. December 9, 2025 kkb/ NABAIL No. 1929 of 2025 2 (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) Digitally signed by :- KRISHNA KUMAR BARANWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench