CHALLA SIVA DURGA RAO v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/13047/2025 · 2025-06-30
Harinath N
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18685 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18685 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010257922025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 13047/2025 Between:
1. CHALLA SIVA DURGA RAO, S/O.SAMBASIVA RAO AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/O.29-33-52,
LAKSHMIVARAPU PETA, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELGAPUDI, AMARAVATI.
2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, AT RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM.
4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, III TOWN POLICE STATION, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, I TOWN POLICE STATION RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
6. CHALLA ANJALI, W/O.SIVA DURGA RAO,
D/O.ACHI VENKATESWARLU, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.1-142 DURGAMMA BAZAR, PIDUGURALLA VILLAGE,
PALNADU DISTRICT.
7. ACHI VENKATESWARLU, S/O.MUTTAYYA, AGED ABOUT 56
2
YEARS, R/O.D.NO.1-142, DURGAMMA BAZAR, PIDUGURALLA VILLAGE, PALNADU DISTRICT.
8. ACHI MUTYALAMMA, W/O.VENKATESWARLU AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.1-142, DURGAMMA BAZAR, PIDUGURALLA VILLAGE, PALNADU DISTRICT.
9. ACHI SATISH, S/O.VENKATESWARLU, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.1-142 DURGAMMA BAZAR, PIDUGURALLA VILLAGE, PALNADU DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. BOLLA VENKATA RAMA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following:
3
ORDER:-
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the Home.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction of 4th respondent in not considering the petitioner’s complaint dated 20.01.2025.
3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the Home submits that the petitioner’s complaint dated 20.01.2025 will be considered by the 4th respondent, as per law.
4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to dispose off the Writ Petition at the stage of admission itself, directing the 4th respondent to consider the petitioners’ complaint dated 20.01.2025, in accordance with law and the procedure contemplated under Section 173(3) of the BNSS, 2023.
5. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed off. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Dt: 24.06.2025 SR