SANTOSH KUMAR KURMI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. PUBLIC WORKS DEPTT. AND 2 OTHERS
/14038/2025 · 2025-12-04
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 186831 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 186831 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14038 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner, learned State Counsel for opposite parties 1 and 3 and Mr. Ambrish Rai learned counsel for opposite party no. 2.
2. Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the opposite party no. 2 to repatriate petitioner with immediate effect.
3. It has been submitted that petitioners who were initially appointed in the Public Works Department of the State Government were sent on deputation to the Uttar Pradesh Expressway Industrial Development Authority and have now spent more than seven years on such deputation but the opposite parties are not repatriating them despite the fact that petitioner is entitled to such repatriation.
4. Learned counsel for petitioner has relied upon in the case of State of Punjab and others versus Inder Singh and others to buttress the fact that petitioner is required to be repatriated.
5. For the said grievance petitioner has already submitted a representation but seek liberty to file a fresh representation before the authority concerned.
6. Considering the innocuous prayer, without entering into merits, liberty is granted to petitioner to file a fresh representation before opposite party no. 2 i.e. Chief Executive Officer, Uttar Pradesh Expressway Industrial Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arjun Prasad Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Sharad Tewari Santosh Kumar Kurmi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Public Works Deptt. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
Development Authority (UPEIDA), Lucknow (U.P.) who shall consider and decide the same within a period of six weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority along with fresh representation in the light of aforesaid judgment in case the same is applicable upon petitioner. Petitioner shall annex copy of the aforesaid
judgment along with the copy of this order.
7. With aforesaid observations and directions, the petition is finally
disposed of. December 4, 2025 prabhat WRIA No. 14038 of 2025 2 (Manish Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- PRABHAT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench