HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11429 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J. 1. This petition has come up before the Court by way of a notice on basis of urgency, as the learned counsel for the petitioners has expressed urgency in the matter. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. In view of proposed order, notice to respondent No.4 is hereby dispensed with. 4. This petition seeks issuance of direction in the nature of certiorari for quashing the impugned F.I.R. bearing FIR/Case Crime No. 0379 of of 2025, under Sections 191(2), 121(1), 132, 115(2), 351(3), 352 of B.N.S. (old Section 147, 332, 353, 323, 506, 504 IPC), Police Station- Cantt. District- Ayodhya. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the offences as alleged in FIR carry maximum punishment for the term less than seven years imprisonment, whereas, the police is trying to arrest them, which is against the mandate of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. 6. Learned A.G.A. appearing for respondents-State has given a statement on behalf of investigating agency that because the offence allegedly committed by the petitioners, entails sentence of less than seven years, provisions of Section 35(3) Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 shall be strictly followed in terms of judgments rendered by Hon'ble Supreme Court in re; Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar and another - (2014) 8 SCC 273 and Satender Kumar Antil vs. CBI and another- (2022) 10 SCC 51. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ajay Kumar Pandey, Anil Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Rakesh Jaiswal And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) 7. Considering the stand of the investigating agency, learned counsel for the petitioners states that his petition be disposed of in view of the above said facts. 8. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of in view of the provisions of Section 35(3) Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and the law as laid down by the Apex Court in re; Arnesh Kumar (supra) and Satender Kumar Antil (supra). 9. However, it is directed that the petitioners shall appear before the Investigating Officer of the concerned police station whenever they are required, to cooperate in the investigation. Thereafter, they shall continue to cooperate in the investigation till its completion, failing which, protection of this order may be withdrawn on the application being moved by the prosecution or the complainant. . (Mrs. Babita Rani,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.) December 3, 2025 Reena/- CRLP No. 11429 of 2025 2 Digitally signed by :- REENA KANNAUJIYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench