RAJESH KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. SECONDARY EDU. DEPTT. LKO. AND 5 OTHERS
WRIA/15178/2025 · 2025-12-19
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 186804 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 186804 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 15178 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Rajiv Singh Chauhan, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State, Mr. Abhineet Jaiswal,
learned counsel for respondent no. 5 and perused the record. Notice to respondent no. 5 is hereby dispensed with. Instant petition has been filed with the following main prayers:-
"(i) To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS commanding the directing the Opposite Parties specially the Opposite Party No. 4 District Inspector of Schools, Ayodhya to absorb/ adjust the Petitioner on the substantive and vacant post occurred on 01.04.2023 due to retirement of one Shri Jaisraj Verma, as earlier the Petitioner was appointed on supernumerary post on the ground that the Petitioner was selected by the Uttar Pradesh Education Service Selection Commission, Prayagraj; in the interest of justice expeditiously as early as possible.
(ii) To issue any other writ, order or direction which this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case" After arguing at length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the interest of justice would be sub-served if this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to give liberty to the petitioner to move a fresh representation before the respondent no. 4 and he may be directed to consider & decide the same, within stipulated period of time as may be fixed by this Court.
Learned counsel for the opposite parties have no objection to the contention aforesaid. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ajay Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Abhineet Jaiswal Rajesh Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Secondary Edu. Deptt. Lko. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s)
Be that as it may, without entering into the merit of the case, the petitioner is permitted to move a fresh representation within period of 15 days, and if such representation is moved within aforesaid period, the respondent no. 4/ District Inspector of Schools, Ayodhya, is hereby directed to consider and decide the same, within further period of eight weeks, in accordance with law, from the date, a certified copy of this order is produced before him. With the aforesaid observations, the instant petition is disposed of.
December 19, 2025 Mayank WRIA No. 15178 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench