[2025:RJ-JP:23206] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6280/2025 1. Pappu @ Dalchand S/o Shri Bhullan, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Jagapada Mahadev Gali, P.s. Bayana, District Bharatpur. (At Present Confined In Central Jail Bharatpur). 2. Naresh S/o Maheshchand, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Jagapada Mahadev Gali, Bayana, P.s. Bayana, District Bharatpur. (At Present Confined In Central Jail Bharatpur). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Brij Mohan Sharma For Complainant(s) For State : : Mr. Gajveer Singh Rajawat for Mr. Anupam Sharma Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA (V. J.) Order 13/06/2025 1. The accused-petitioners have filed this bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. arising out of F.I.R. No.699/2014 registered with the Police Station Bayana, District Bharatpur for offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 452, 302 & 427 of IPC. 2. Heard. 3. Considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused-petitioners and the learned Public Prosecutor as well as the learned counsel for the complainant and so also perused the [2025:RJ-JP:23206] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-6280/2025] material made available on record. 4. On consideration of submissions made by learned counsel for the accused-petitioners as well as the learned Public Prosecutor and perusal of the material made available on record, this Court finds that though the accused-petitioners were named in the F.I.R., however, the Police after completion of investigation did not find the allegations to be proved against the present accused- petitioners and no charge was submitted against them. Since the charge-sheet has been filed against the accused-petitioners and during the trial proceedings on an application filed under Section 319 Cr.P.C., the cognizance has been taken against the accused- petitioners for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 341, 452, 325, 427 & 302 of IPC. 5. It has also come on record that against the order of cognizance, the accused-petitioners Pappu @ Dalchand and Naresh preferred S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No.1489/2023, which was dismissed vide order dated 29.04.2025. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the accused-petitioners that initially the High Court passed an interim order in favour of the accused-petitioners in the criminal revision petition, however, after dismissal of the revision petition, the accused-petitioners surrendered themselves on 02.05.2025. 6. Having regard to the facts as stated above and more particularly the fact that the accused-petitioners are in custody since 02.05.2025 and other co-accused persons who were charge- sheeted at the initial stage have already been enlarged on bail, [2025:RJ-JP:23206] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-6280/2025] this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail. 7. This bail application is, accordingly, allowed and it is directed7 that accused-petitioners shall be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court or any other Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA (V. J.)),J ARTI SHARMA /147