HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 11189 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Sri Abhishek Singh, learned counsel for petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondent nos. 1 to 4. 2. In light of the proposed order, notices to respondent No. 5 is dispensed with. 3. It has been submitted by learned counsel for petitioner that the house of the petitioner exists on Gata No. 225 area 0.2500 hect. in Village Jaimal Nagar Gram Sabha, Khatauli, Tehsil - Malihabad, Distict Lucknow. 4. It has been submitted that petitioner has moved an application U/S 30 of U.P. Revenue Code for correction of map and it is during pendency of the said proceedings that the Gram pradhan is attempting to demolish the boundary wall of the petitioner and it is in the aforesaid circumstances the present writ petition has been filed prayed for a direction to the respondents not to demolish the boundary wall of the petitioner during pendency of the aforesaid proceedings which are pending before the Additional District Magistrate (Judicial), Lucknow. 5. Learned Standing Counsel submits that the petitioner has efficacious remedy of moving an appropriate application in proceeding U/S 30 of U.P. Revenue Code which is pending in the Court of Additional District Magistrate (Judicial). 6. At this stage, learned counsel for petitioner has submitted that the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ramesh Chandra, Abhishek Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Raj Kumari .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue, Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) grievance of the petitioner shall be substantially redressed in case liberty is granted to the petitioner to move appropriate application in the pending proceedings before Additional District Magistrate (Judicial) who may be directed to consider and decide the application of the petitioner in a time bound manner. 7. In light of the above and without entering into merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to move appropriate application before Additional District Magistrate (Judicial) within one week from today and in case the same is moved within time, the Additional District Magistrate (Judicial) shall consider and decide the same within three weeks thereafter in accordance with law. 8. It shall be open for the Additional District Magistrate (Judicial) to pass ad interim injunction if the case is so made by the petitioner in accordance with law. 9. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, till orders are passed on his application for interim relief, no coercive measure shall be taken against the petitioner. 10. It is made clear that the order passed by this Court shall cease to exists on appropriate order being passed by the Additional District Magistrate (Judicial). November 20, 2025 Ravi/ WRIC No. 11189 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench