SUMIT YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER
/11313/2025 · 2025-11-20
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 186763 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 186763 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11313 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.
2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.298 of 2025, under sections 69, 115(2), 351(2) BNS, P.S. Chinhat, District Lucknow.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of FIR it was alleged that informant met the applicant while he was working in a bank and subsequently both of them started staying together since the year 2020 and relationship were formed on false pretext of marriage. The tentative age of the victim is around 27 years.
4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.
5. Considering the fact that the relationship continued for over a span of 5 years and the age of the victim, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 29.6.2025 and has no criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed.
6. Let the applicant Sumit Yadav be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Karunesh Singh, Sudhir Kumar, Vijay Pratap Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Sumit Yadav .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 20, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 11313 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench