Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
208 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-5069-2025 Date of decision: 19.05.2025 VIKRAM SINGH ….PETITIONER(S)
Versus STATE OF HARYANA
....RESPONDENT(S)
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV BERRY Present:- None for the petitioner. Mr. Surender Singh, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Rajiv Kumar Saini, Advocate for the complainant (through Video Conferencing). ***** SANJIV BERRY, J.(ORAL) Even despite the case being called repeatedly, none has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner. Perusal of the report would reveal that even on the last dates, none has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner. Accordingly the petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.
(SANJIV BERRY) JUDGE 19.05.2025 kanika i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No KANIKA 2025.05.20 18:11 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment