Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 186745 (ALL)

ARCHANA YADAV v. RAJEEV KUMAR

/6973/2025 · 2025-12-04

Subhash Vidyarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6973 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. After advancing submission at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not want to press the present petition at this stage and he will file appropriate application before the Family Court itself. 3. Accordingly, present application is dismissed as not pressed. 4. Office is directed to return the certified copies of the documents annexed to the present petition to the learned counsel for the petitioner after retaining photocopies of the same on record. December 4, 2025 V. Sinha Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Yogendra Nath Yadav, Saurabh Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Archana Yadav .....Petitioner(s) Rajeev Kumar .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench