Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18672 (JHR)

FURKAN ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./4196/2025 · 2025-08-11

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:22918 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI A.B.A. No. 4196 of 2025 ---- 1.Furkan Ansari aged about 32 years 2.Hasan Ansari @ Hasen Ansari aged about 30 years 3.Husen Ansari @ Hussain Ansari aged about 28 years 4.Saddam Ansari aged about 26 years all are son of Kasim Ansari @ Miya resident of Village Podeya PO Dumariya PS Sonaraithari District Deoghar Jharkhand .... Petitioner -- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioner :- Mr. Shamaiel Raza, Advocate For the State :- Mr. A.K. Tiwari, Advocate ---- 5/11.08.2025 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel for the respondent State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Sonaraithari P.S. Case No.26 of 2025, for the offence registered under sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109(1), 303(2) 352, 3(5) of BNS, 2023 pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Deoghar. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case and the offences are bailable in nature except section 109(1) and 303(2) BNS, 2023. 4. Learned counsel for the State opposed the prayer and submits that except, petitioner no.4, the petitioner nos.1,2 and 3 are having criminal antecedent and the allegations are further there of assault against the petitioner no.4. 5. Considering that the petitioner nos.1,2 and 3 are having criminal antecedent and the allegations are further there of assault against the petitioner no.4, I am not inclined to grant the petitioners anticipatory bail, and as such, their prayer for anticipatory bail is hereby rejected. ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) SI/