RANDHI VENKATA SATYA NARAYANA MURTHY v. THE STATE OF AP
WP/13394/2025 · 2025-06-15
Challa Gunaranjan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18672 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18672 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN WRIT PETITION NO: 13394 OF 2025 Between: Randhi Venkata Satya Narayana Murthy, S/o Randhi Mallu Naidu, Age. 51 years, Occ. School Assistant, ZPH School, Dharmavaram, Srungavarapukota Mandal, Vizianagaram District ...Petitioner AND
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur district. The Regional Joint Director, School Education, Visakhapatnam. The District Collector, And Chairman, DSC, Vizianagaram. The District Educational Officer, Vizianagaram District, Vizianagaram. Zilla Praja Parishad, Vizianagaram, Vizianagaram District
2.
3.
4.
5. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ or directions more particularly the Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the official respondents more particularly the respondent No.4 in not considering the Petitioner for Promotion to the Post of Headmaster Gr.11 (Gazetted) as per his original
seniority but based on illegal tentative Seniority as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to law, unconstitutional, official bias, discriminative in nature and contrary to the A.P Service Rules, in the interest of Justice.
lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents2 to 4 to consider the case of the Petitioner for Promotion to the Post of Headmaster Gr.ll (Gazetted) in ensuing counsel during summer 2025 based on his seniority (as per General Seniority), eligibility, qualifications by disposing of his representations dt. 17.04.2025 & 16.04.2025, in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: M/s CORPUS JURIS LAW PANEL LLP Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES II The Court made the following order:
4 APHC010258712025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3506] MONDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN WRIT PETITION No.13394 of 2025 Between: Randhi Venkata Satya Narayana Murthy ...PETITIONER AND The State of AP and others ...RESPONDENT{S) Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.CORPUS JURIS LAW PANEL LLP Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR SERVICES II The Court made the following:
2 CGR,J W.P.No.13394 of 2025 Y
ORDER;
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of subsequent development that the petitioner has been promoted, the cause in the writ petition has rendered infructuous. Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed.
Sd/- A.VIJAYA BABU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, M/s Corpus Juris Law Panel Lip Advocate [OPUC] GP for Services II, High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]
1. OneCCto Two CCs to
2.
3. Three CD Copies GSC
'IP HIGH COURT DATED:16/06/2025
ORDER WP.No.13394of2025 Sf 3IIJUL 2025 )s' Sectign^^^ DISMISSING THE WP AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS