RAMA SHANKAR LAL AND OTHERS v. SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER, LALGANJ, PRATAPGARH AND OTHERS
/7094/2025 · 2025-12-09
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 186717 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 186717 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7094 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent while notice on behalf of respondent No.2 Gaon Sabha has been accepted by Sri Pankaj Gupta.
2. In view of the proposed order notice to private respondents is hereby dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioners praying for direction to the respondent No.1 - Sub Divisional Officer, Lalganj, District Pratapgarh to decide application for restoration/recall in case No.207/2014, computerized case No.T201402570200207 "Ram Niwas Vs. Gaon Sabha and others" under Section 41 of Land Revenue Act, expeditiously.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case aforesaid case is considered and decided in a time bound manner, to which learned Standing Counsel has no objection.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent No.1- Sub Divisional Officer, Lalganj, District Pratapgarh is directed to decide application for restoration/recall in case No.207/2014, computerized case No.T201402570200207 "Ram Niwas Vs. Gaon Sabha and others" under Section 41 of Land Revenue Act expeditiously, say within a period of four months, if possible, from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, if there is no legal impediment.
6. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.
7. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. December 9, 2025 RKM. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Puttu Lal Misra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pankaj Gupta (Alok Mathur,J.) Rama Shankar Lal And Others .....Petitioner(s) Sub Divisional Officer, Lalganj, Pratapgarh And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench