HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 29762 of 2017 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. 1. Case called out. 2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition. 3. Learned counsel for the State is present. 4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. 5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 6. Consigned to records. December 9, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Satish Kumar Sharma Counsel for Respondent(s) : Ratnesh Chandra (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Mithai Lal .....Petitioner(s) Chairman U.P. State Road Transport Corporation Lko. And Anr. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench