HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12279 of 2025 Court No. - 15 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State, and perused the record. Present bail application has been filed seeking bail in Case Crime No. 58 of 2024 under Sections 2/3 (1) of U.P. Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Police Station-Kotwali Dehat, District-Sultanpur. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that in the gang chart, one case has been shown against the applicant, in that case, he has already been enlarged on bail. The bail order is on record as Annexure No. 3 to the bail application. Apart from the sole case mentioned in the gang chart, applicant has criminal history of three cases. Out of three cases, in two cases applicant has been enlarged on bail by the Court concerned. So far as the third case is concerned, no notice has been served upon the applicant in this regard. In the Case Crime No. 662 of 2024 under Sections 351(2), 351(3), 352 BNS, P.S.- Kotwali Nagar, District-Sultanpur, applicant has not been charge sheeted. It is further submitted that co-accused Ajay Verma has already been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 26.11.2025 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 11755 of 2025. The applicant seeks parity with the bail order of the said co-accused. Learned Additional Government Advocate as well as Sri Ved Prakash, Advocate, who has filed the vakalatnama on behalf of complainant, which is taken on record, have opposed the prayer made by the learned counsel for the applicant but could not dispute that it is a case of parity. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Prashant Dubey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Alok Verma .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) Perused the record. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances and also that co-accused Ajay Verma has already been granted bail by this Court, single case shown in the gang chart, applicant has been enlarged on bail, he has explained the criminal history of three cases against him except one case mentioned in the gang chart, applicant is in jail since 20.12.2023 and according to the counsel for the applicant evidence of Doctor concerned in this case is going on before the trial Court and fact of witnesses have already been examined and this statement has not been disputed by the learned counsel for the complainant and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I find it to be a fit case for enlarging the applicant on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. Let the applicant-Alok Verma involved in aforesaid case crime be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate/Court concerned, subject to following conditions:- (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial Court. Any other condition(s) which the trial court/concerned court may deem fit and proper, in the circumstances of the case, may also be imposed. It is clarified that the observations made in this order are confined to the present bail application and shall have no bearing on the merits of the trial. December 8, 2025 Vinay/- BAIL No. 12279 of 2025 2 (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) Digitally signed by :- VINAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- VINAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- VINAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench