Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18666 (AP)

Gujjali Maheswari v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/17044/2020 · 2025-01-24

Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSANDAND TWENTY FIVE X 30 O PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 17044 OF 2020 Between: 1. Gujjali Maheswari, D/o Matyalingam, Port Quarters, Type-ll, 61-612 Saligramapuram, Visakhapatnam-530024. ...Petitioner AND 1, The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Higher Education (UE) Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi Amaravathi, Guntur District-522 238. 2. The Registrar, Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University (JNTU), Kakinada, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh-533 003. 3. The Controller of Examinations, Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University (JNTU), Kakinada, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh- 533 003. 4. The Principal, PYDAH College of Engineering and Technology, Gambheeram, Visakhapatnam District, Andhra Pradesh-531 163. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court be pleased to issue an Appropriate Writ, order or Direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus may more action of the Respondent No.2 and 3 are not issued the petitioner Laboratory marks in the marks in the laboratory exam bearing Regd. No. 08K11A0578 in III B.Tech, ll-Semester, Laboratory examination on 11-04-2011 forthe subject of operating system - Complier Design Laboratory examination on 11-04- 2011 for the subject of Operating System & complier Design Laboratory (Sub code V3271) and to grant compensation for loss of three Government , Jobs and other relief or reliefs as this Honourable Court may deems fit and C'- > proper in the circumstance of the case. ■A-' ■■ lA NO: 1 OF 2020 - Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No 2 and 3 to issue the petitioner laboratory Marks in the marks memo bearing Registration No. 08K11A0578 in III B.Tech, II Semester, Laboratory examination dated on 11-04-2011 for the subject of Operating System & Compiler Design Laboratory (Sub Code V3271) and such Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI GOTIVADA RAMU Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION Counsel for the Respondents No.2 and 3: SRI I MADHU BABU, STANDING COUNSEL The Court made the following ORDER: . ^ APHC010258712020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] £ 01^ FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 17044/2020 Between: ...PETITIONER Gujjali Maheswari AND ...RESPONDENT(S) The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.GOTIVADA RAMU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION 2.1 MADHU BABU (SC FOR JNTU KAKINADA) 2 V. The court made the following order: Despite the matter being posted under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Therefore, it evinces that the petitioner has no interest to prosecute the case. Hence, the present Writ Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, pending if any in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed. SD/- G HELA NAIDU ASSISTANT REGISTRARS CTiOfrOFFICER //TRUE COPY// SE To, 1. One CC to SRI GOTIVADA RAMU Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION Pradesh [OUT] High Court of Andhra 3. One CC to SRI I MADHU BABU, STANDING COUNSEL [OPUC] 4. Three CD Copies PMT WNS - SECTION HIGH COURT DATED:24/01/2025 ORDER Y 07MWZ® Bj WP.No.17044of 2020 &a. cutteoi s««o» ^ ^ioeSPATC'&S DISMISSING THE WP FOR NON-PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS