VATSAL UPADHYAY AND 4 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. MEDICAL AND HEALTH DEPTT. LKO AND 3 OTHERS
/11589/2025 · 2025-12-04
Manjive Shukla, Shekhar B Saraf
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 186650 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 186650 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 11589 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J.
HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J.
1. Heard Shri Mohd. Mansoor along with Shri Mohammad Danish learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.1 and 2, Shri Gyanendra Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No.3 and Shri Hari Anuj Bahadur Sinha, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No.4. 2. The present writ petition has been filed, inter alia, for the following relief:-
"(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS commanding the U.P. State Medical Faculty/respondent no.03 to register the names of the petitioners with the U.P. State Medical Faculty as has been done in case of the colleagues of the petitioner pursuant to the direction of this Hon'ble Court at Allahabad dated 10.12.2024 passed in Writ-C No.25620 of 2024 (Soni Pandey and 07 others vs State of U.P. and others) as well as judgment and order dated 28.05.2025 passed in Writ-C No.17359 of 2025 (Rukhsana @ Rukhsana Naqvi and others vs State of U.P. and others)."
3. Learned counsel for respective parties submit that the instant writ petition can be disposed of in terms of the judgment and order passed by a coordinate Bench of this Court at Lucknow in Misc. Bench No. 10184 of Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mohd. Mansoor, Mohammad Danish, Mohd Siddiq Alam Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Gyanendra Kumar Srivastava, Hari Anuj Bahadur Sinha Vatsal Upadhyay And 4 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Medical And Health Deptt. Lko And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
2008, Shailesh Kumar Mishra s/o Krishna Chandra Mishra v. State of State of U.P. and others, decided on 3.5.2018. The operative portion of the order reads thus :-
"8. We find no reason to deprive the petitioners to the same facility. In such circumstances, we dispose of this petition in terms of above extracted order. The petitioners may apply to the U.P. State Medical Faculty for registration. 9. We direct the U.P. State Medical Faculty to consider the case of the petitioners for registration in terms of above extracted orders. The petitioners may apply within 30 days from today. 10. Claim of the petitioners for registration with U.P. State Medical Faculty would be considered within 60 days thereof. 2.
The writ petition is disposed of in terms of above extracted order."
4. The writ petition is allowed in terms of the decision rendered in Shailesh Kumar Mishra (supra). December 4, 2025 Ashutosh WRIC No. 11589 of 2025 2 (Manjive Shukla,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench