Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 186643 (ALL)

SUHAIL @ SUHAIL AHMAD v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO

BAIL/12215/2025 · 2025-12-05

Karunesh Singh Pawar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12215 of 2025 Court No. - 15 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J. Heard learned counsel for the accused-applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant, while pressing the bail application, submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case as well as in the only case shown in the gang chart. It is stated that he has already been granted bail in that case, and the bail order has been filed as Annexure-3 to the application. It is further submitted that the base case forming the foundation for invocation of the Gangsters Act pertains to recovery below commercial quantity. Except for the single case mentioned in the gang chart, no other case is pending against the applicant. It has been further submitted that applicant is in jail since 18.11.2025 and if facility of bail is granted, there is no apprehension that he will flee from the judicial process and he will abide by the orders passed by the Court below and will co-operate in speedy trial of the case. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail but has not disputed the factual submissions made by the learned counsel for the accused- applicant. On due consideration to the fact that in the solitary case mentioned in the gang chart, he has been enlarged on bail; apart from the solitary case mentioned in the gang chart, there is no other case pending against the applicant as well as considering the fact that the applicant is languishing Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Bharat Kumar Dixit Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Suhail @ Suhail Ahmad .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko .....Opposite Party(s) in jail since 18.11.2025, I find it to be a fit case for enlarging the applicant on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. Let the applicant, Suhail @ Suhail Ahmad, involved in Case Crime no. 285/2025, Under Section 2/3 U.P. Gangster Act 1986 Police Station Deeh, District-Raebareli, be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions which are being imposed in the interest of justice:- (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial Court. (iv) The applicant shall submit an undertaking on affidavit in terms of Section 19 (4) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 that he will not indulge in any case for or misuse the liberty of bail. Any other condition(s) which the trial court/concerned court may deem fit and proper, in the circumstances of the case, may also be imposed. It is clarified that the observations made in this order are confined to the present bail application and shall have no bearing on the merits of the trial. December 5, 2025 R.C. BAIL No. 12215 of 2025 2 (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAM CHANDER YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench