HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 1999 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record. The instant application has been filed by the applicant to permit him to submit two sureties and one personal bond for all three cases from the applicant and applicant has been granted bail in all cases by the court below. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in all three cases. He next submitted that in all the cases registered against the applicant, he has been granted bail by the court below. He says that the applicant is very poor person and not in a position to furnish huge sureties in each and every case in compliance of bail orders. It is further submitted that the details of cases registered against applicant in District-Lucknow are as follows:- (i) Case Crime No. 351 of 2025, U/S- 304(2) 317(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023/Corresponding Section for 317(2) is 411 I.P.C., 304 BNS is New Addition for Snatching, Police Station- Krishna Nagar. (ii) Case Crime No. 0357 of 2022, U/S- U/S-304(2) 317(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023/Corresponding Section for 317(2) is 411 I.P.C., 304 BNS is New Addition for Snatching, Police Station Krishna Nagar, (iii) Case Crime No. 440 of 2025, U/S-3/25 Arms Act, Police Station- Krishna Nagar, Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : D.P. Dutt Tiwari, Vineet Gupta Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Akash Kasyap .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) Learned counsel for the applicant has relied upon the judgment of the Apex Court passed in Special Leave to Appeal (Criminal) No. 8914-8915 of 2018; Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky Vs. State of U.P. Learned A.G.A. submits that he does not want to file any counter affidavit. In view of the facts and circumstances as well as rival submissions advanced by the learned counsel for both the parties, the present application stands disposed of finally in the light law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky (Supra) and the Court below is directed to execute the personal bond of Rs. 20,000/- in every case and produce two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court/Magistrate concerned in one case which shall hold good for rest of the cases. December 4, 2025 Jyoti/- NA528 No. 1999 of 2025 2 (Saurabh Lavania,J.) Digitally signed by :- JYOTI RAJWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench