Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 186584 (ALL)

MAMTA SINGH v. Union of India through Additional Secretary Cooperative Societies and others.

WRIC/11979/2025 · 2025-12-09

Amitabh Kumar Rai, Sangeeta Chandra

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 11979 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Ashwini Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the opposite party no.1. 2. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following main prayers : "Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus thereby commanding the opp. party no.1 to take action against the opp. party nos.2 to 4 to refund the hard earn money i.e. total amount of Rs.2,59,379 which interest to the petitioner, which was deposited by the petitioner and also direct them to decide the representation of the petitioner." 3. Sri Ashwini Kumar Singh, learned counsel for opposite party no.1 says that petitioner has to move an online application on the CRCS portal, details of which have been provided by her to the petitioner's counsel who in turn claims benefit of order dated 24.10.2024 passed in Writ-C No.9032 of 2024 [Mukund Pal Singh vs. Union of India & Ors.] which reads as under:- "Heard Shri Rohit Tripathi, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Shri Mahendra Kumar Mishra, learned Counsel for the opposite party no. 1. The petitioner herein claims himself to be the creditor of the Societies i.e. opposite parties no. 3 & 4, which according to him are Multi-State co- operative societies. In support of his contention, certificate of registration of the opposite party no. 3 society is annexed as Annexure No. 1 to the petition. However, certificate of registration of the opposite party no. 4 society has Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Yogendra Singh, Alok Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I. Mamta Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P.Thru.Addl.Secy. Coop. Societies, Dept.Of Agri.Cooperation And Farmers Welfare And Ors. .....Respondent(s) not been filed nor is there any other document to show that it is a multi-State co-operative society. Nevertheless, if the said societies are multi State co-operative societies and are covered by the Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002, as also, if the petitioner is a creditor, and there is no other legal impediment, then he may avail the remedy available under Section 80 of the Multi-State Co- operative Societies Act, 2002 raising his grievance, which shall be considered and decided as per law. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of in the aforesaid terms." 4. Petitioner may do the needful either as suggested by Sri Ashiwini Kumar Singh, learned counsel for opposite party no.1 or as observed in the above quoted order dated 24.10.2024. 5. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. December 9, 2025 Mahesh WRIC No. 11979 of 2025 2 (Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) (Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J.) Digitally signed by :- MAHESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench