APHC010258742020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No: 17054/2020 Between: SHAIK SHAFIA, W/O SUBHANI, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, OCC HOUSE WIFE, 11/O. DOOR NO.12-3-94,LANE, A.T. AGRAHARAM, GUNTUR. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR URBAN, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, NAGARAMPALEM POLICE STATION, NAGARAMPALEM, GUNTUR. 4. BAGYA RAJU, SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NAGARAMPALEM POLICE STATION, NAGARAMPALEM, GUNTUR. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, MAHILA DISA POLICE STATION, NAGARAMPALEM, GUNTUR DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G KONDALA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondent No.5 insisting me to no for a compromise / family counseling with my husband namely Subhani, S/o. Bade Saheb, even though the complaint which made an against him clinchingly establishes a cognizable offence i.e., my husband is insisting me to do prostitution as arbitrary, illegal colorable excess of power apart me violative of fundamental 2 rights guaranteed to me under articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent No.5 to act on my complaint dated 14-08-2020.” 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri G.Kondala Rao, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that no further orders are required in this matter as the relief sought in this petition has become infructuous. 3. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, would submit that Court may pass appropriate orders. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is dismissed as the relief has become infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:09.09.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.17054 of 2020 Dt.09.09.2025 Dinesh