MANI SHANKAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. AGRICULTURE LKO. AND 5 OTHERS
/13295/2025 · 2025-11-20
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 186561 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 186561 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 13295 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties.
2. Petition has been filed seeking a direction to authority concerned for payment of post-retiral benefits including pension, gratuity, leave encashment, commutation of pension, G.P.F. and other consequential benefits alongwith interest thereon from the date of retirement till the date of actual payment.
3. It has been submitted that petitioner has superannuated from service on 31.07.2023 from the post of Technical Assistant but has not been paid the aforesaid benefits despite the fact that there is no judicial or departmental proceeding pending against him.
4. Since considering petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file fresh representation before the competent authority who shall consider and decide the same within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of fresh representation along with a certified copy of this order. In case petitioner is found entitled for the said benefits actual payment shall be ensured within a period of six weeks thereafter.
5. With aforesaid direction(s), the petition is finally disposed of. November 20, 2025 lakshman Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Birendra Kumar Yadav, Amit Kumar, Hema Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Mani Shankar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Agriculture Lko. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- LAKSHMANA KUMAR TAMMANA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench