Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:18970 CRL.RP No. 510 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 510 OF 2021
BETWEEN:
SRI. ANANDAPPA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, S/O RUDRAPPA, RESIDING AT NO.5, PROPERTY NO.1541/78/2/03, NANJAPPA ROAD, THINDLU MAIN ROAD, VIDYARANYAPURA, BENGALURU-560 097. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SOMARAJU A., ADVOCATE) AND:
SMT. SHOBHA W/O LATE CHIKKAVEERAPPA, RESIDING AT NO.81/3, CHANUKYA LAYOUT, SUB-REGISTRAR OFFICE ROAD, NAGAVARA A.C. POST, BANGALORE-560 045. …RESPONDENT (RESPONDENT SERVED, UNREPRESENTED)
Digitally signed by LAKSHMI T Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:18970 CRL.RP No. 510 of 2021
THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE ENTIRE RECORDS IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1809/2018 ON THE FILE OF LXV ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, (CCH 66) BANGALORE; SET ASIDE THE
ORDER DATED 28.08.2019 CONFIRMING THE CONVICTION OF SENTENCE AND FINE CONFIRMING THE SAME PASSED IN C.C.NO.6532/2017 ON 03.08.2018 BY THE XVIII ADDL. CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, BENGALURU, ALLOW THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION WITH COSTS.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for petitioner has filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition.
2. The memo reads thus:
“It is submitted that, the Petitioner has paid the entire fine amount to the Respondent before the trial court after passing of the order passed in Criminal Appeal No.1809/2018 by the City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, and during the pendency of the aforesaid petition. The Petitioner has paid the entire amount as per the orders passed by the trial court in C.C.No.6532/2017.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:18970 CRL.RP No. 510 of 2021
Wherefore the Petitioner above named prays that this Hon’ble Court be pleased to dismiss the above petition as withdrawn, in the interest of justice.”
3. In view of the memo, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- (SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR) JUDGE
HB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8 CT:ar