Nallagorla Venkata Rao v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/13182/2024 · 2025-07-01
Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18656 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18656 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010258592024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] WEDNESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 13182/2024 Between:
1. NALLAGORLA VENKATA RAO, S/O VENKATESWARLU, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/O 4-32 UPPUTUR VILLAGE, PARCHURU MANDAL, BAPATIA DISTRICT
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT,
A.P SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND PLANNING, A.P SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, BAPATLA, BAPATLA DISTRICT. 4. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PANCHYATHI RAJ DEPARTMENT, P R I PLUS PIU DIVISION , BAPATLA, BAPATLA DISTRICT. 5. THE DY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PRI SUB DIVISION, PARCHURU, BAPATLA DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S):
2
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. KODE RAMESH BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV
2. GP FOR REVENUE
3. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING
3
The Court made the following ORAL ORDER:
Heard Sri K.R.Srinivas, learned Counsel, representing Sri K.Ramesh Babu, P.Rajesh Kumar, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj & Rural Development and Sri K.Bhagat Singh, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue. 3. Sri P.Rajesh Kumar, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj, has submitted the Written Instructions furnished by the Executive Engineer, PRI+PIU Division, Bapatla. A copy of it is supplied to the learned Counsel for the Petitioner, and the same is taken on record. 3. The Payment Summary would indicate that the total value of work done by the Petitioner is for an amount of Rs.19,88,320/-, the government deductions are for a sum of Rs.2,36,853/-. The Respondents, therefore, admitted the claim made by the Petitioner for a sum of Rs.17,51,467/-. 4. In view of the admitted claim of Rs.17,51,467/- towards full and final settlement, the Respondents are directed to complete the entire administrative process, intra-department and inter-department, within a period of Sixteen (16) weeks, by way of Cooperation and Co- ordination, and transfer the said amount to the account of the Petitioner within four (4) weeks thereafter. 4
5. The Petitioner is directed to furnish the bank details to the Competent Authority to enable them to transfer the amount within the time specified by this Court. 6. With these directions and observations, this Writ Petition stands allowed. No order as to costs. 7.
Interlocutory Applications, if any, shall stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 02.07.2025 MH
5
72
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD
WRIT PETITION No.13182 OF 2024
Dt.02.07.2025 MH