VINOD KUMAR TIWARI AND 2 ORS. v. STATE OF U.P. THRU SECY.BASIC EDU.CIVIL SECTT.LUCKNOW and ORS.
WRIA/6092/2017 · 2025-11-20
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 186551 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 186551 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 6092 of 2017 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioners to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State and Mr. Ran Vijay Singh, counsel for respondent no. 3 are present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records. November 20, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ram Raj Ojha, Girija Shankar Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Ajay Kumar, Prashant Arora (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Vinod Kumar Tiwari And 2 Ors. .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Secy.Basic Edu.Civil Sectt.Lucknow And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench