Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 186546 (ALL)

DEEPAK KUMAR SRIVASTAVA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. BASIC EDU. DEPTT. OF CIVIL SECTT. and ORS.

WRIA/17353/2016 · 2025-12-04

Shree Prakash Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 17353 of 2016 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. 1. Case called out. 2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition. 3. Learned counsel for the State, Dr. Uday Veer Sing, counsel for respondent nos. 5 & 6 and Mr. Ran Vijay Singh, counsel for respondent no. 3 are present. 4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. 5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 6. Consigned to records. December 4, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mohd. Mustafizul Haq Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C, Vindhyawashini Kumar (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Deepak Kumar Srivastava .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Basic Edu. Deptt. Of Civil Sectt. And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench