Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 186543 (ALL)

KALEEM MISTRY v. STATE OF U.P. THRU.PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

BAIL/11808/2025 · 2025-12-05

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11808 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State; Shri Vikas Pandey, learned counsel for the informant and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.78 of 2025, under Section 137(2), 64(2)M, 65(1) BNS & Section 5(L)/6 of POCSO Act, P.S. Gaisadi, District Balrampur. 3. In terms of the FIR allegations were levelled that on 24.09.2025 at about 11 AM daughter of the informant was enticed by the applicant and thereafter, physical relations were formed and thereafter, she was left. FIR was lodged on 03.10.2025. In the statement under section 180 BNSS, victim stated that around 6 to 7 months ago, the victim was enticed and wrong was committed on her. A similar statement was given under Section 183 BNSS. Victim refused to undergo medical examination. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the delay in lodging the FIR and the tentative age of the victim which is around 18 to 19 years, the applicant who is in custody since 05.10.2025 is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant Kaleem Mistry be released on bail in aforesaid FIR Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mohd.Mateen, Ajeet Kumar Srivastava, Rajjab Ali Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Kaleem Mistry .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru.Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. December 5, 2025 nishant BAIL No. 11808 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench