IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.10511 of 2025 Date of Decision: 02.07.2025 _______________________________________________________ Mr. Ashok Kumar …….Petitioner Versus HRTC and Another ….Respondents _______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Balwant Singh Thakur and Ms. Nargis Thakur, Advocates. For the Respondents: Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate. ____________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge (oral): Learned counsel representing the petitioner, on instructions, states that the petitioner would be content and satisfied in case directions are issued to the respondents to consider and decide his case in light of judgment dated 9.11.2023, passed by Division Bench of this Court in CWPOA No. 2343 of 2020, titled Vikram Singh v. Himachal Road Transport Corporation (along with connected matters), in a time bound manner. 2. Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate, while putting in appearance on behalf of the respondents, fairly states that he is not averse to aforesaid innocuous prayer made on behalf of the petitioner. 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 3. Consequently, in view of the above, this Court without going into the merits of the case deems it fit to dispose of the present petition with a direction to the respondents to consider and decide case of the petitioner in light of aforesaid judgment expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks. Ordered accordingly. Needless to say, authority concerned, while doing the needful in terms of instant order, shall afford an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and pass a speaking order thereupon. Pending applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of. p` (Sandeep Sharma), Judge July 02, 2025 (Rajeev Raturi)