1 2025:CGHC:18375 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 386 of 2025 1 - Biranchi Chaudhari S/o Hiralal Chaudhari Aged About 47 Years R/o Ahead Of Railway Crossing, Ward No. 50, Borsibhatha, Durg, District - Durg Chhattisgarh (As Per Annexure P/1) 2 - Jivan Yadav S/o Kartik Yadav (Wrongly Mentioned As Kranti Yadav) Aged About 43 Years R/o Ahead Of Railway Crossing, Ward No. 50, Borsibhatha, Durg, District - Durg Chhattisgarh (As Per Annexure P/1) 3 - Smt. Sunita Bhonsle W/o Shivaji Bhonsle Aged About 51 Years R/o Ahead Of Railway Crossing, Ward No. 50, Borsibhatha, Durg, District - Durg Chhattisgarh (As Per Annexure P/1) 4 - Domar Banjare S/o Aamir Banjare Aged About 58 Years R/o Ahead Of Railway Crossing, Ward No. 50, Borsibhatha, Durg, District - Durg Chhattisgarh (As Per Annexure P/1) 5 - Smt. Asha Sahu W/o Late Hemant Sahu Aged About 44 Years R/o Ahead Of Railway Crossing, Ward No. 50, Borsibhatha, Durg, District - Durg Chhattisgarh (As Per Annexure P/1) 6 - Kunj Sahu S/o Late Ganesh Sahu Aged About 50 Years R/o Ahead Of Railway Crossing, Ward No. 50, Borsibhatha, Durg, District - Durg Chhattisgarh (As Per Annexure P/1) ... Petitioners versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Principal Secretary, Urban Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Collector, Durg District Durg Chhattisgarh YOGESH TIWARI Digitally signed by YOGESH TIWARI Date: 2025.04.25 10:09:06 +0530 2 3 - Nagar Palika Nigam Durg Through Commissioner, Durg, District - Durg Chhattisgarh 4 - Smt. Suman Nadesan Unni W/o K. Krishnan Unni Aged About 56 Years R/o Quarter No. 4/a, Steet No. 35, Sector-10, Bhilai, District Durg Chhattisgarh ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioners : Mr. Tarendra Kumar Jha, Advocate For Respondents No.1 & 2 : Ms. Upasana Mehta, Dy. G.A. For Respondent No.3 : Mr. Praveen Das, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad, Judge Order on Board 23.04.2025 1. Heard Mr. Tarendra Kumar Jha, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as Ms. Upasana Mehta, learned Deputy Government Advocate, appearing for the State/respondents No.1 and 2 and Mr. Praveen Das, learned counsel, appearing for the respondent No.3. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to approach before the authority concerned. 3. Prayer seems to be fair and reasonable. 4. Accordingly, instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty granted in favour of the petitioners. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Yogesh