Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 186532 (ALL)

SOHAN RAM v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPTT. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/14046/2025 · 2025-12-05

Shree Prakash Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14046 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Rishabh Kapoor, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 2 to 4 and Mr. Saharsh, learned counsel for the respondent no.1. By means of the present petitioner, the petitioner has sought following prayers:- "i. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature mandamus commanding the opposite parties to make the payment of arears of pay for recommendation of 5th, 6th and 7th pay commission as well as arears of 1st and 2nd ACP and accordingly revised pension and other pensionary benefits with arears etc. along with 12% interest p.a. for delayed period within a stipulated period as fixed by this Hon'ble court." Learned counsel for the petitioner, after argument at length, submits that the interest of justice would be sub-served if this Hon'ble Court is pleased to give liberty to the petitioner to move fresh representation before the respondent no.3 within fifteen days and direct the respondent no.3 to consider and decide the same in accordance with law, within stipulated period of time as may be fixed by this Court. Learned counsels for the respondents have no objection to the submission aforesaid. Be that as it may, without entering into merits of the case, the petitioner is given liberty to move fresh representation before the respondent no.3/Chief Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Jagdambika Prasad Tripathi, Indra Jeet Yadav, Vishwanath Prasad Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Rishabh Kapoor Sohan Ram .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Urban Development Deptt. Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Engineer, (E-2-2), U.P. Jal Nigam, 6, Rana Pratap Marg, Lucknow within fifteen days and in case such representation is moved, the respondent no.3 is directed to consider and decide the same in accordance with law, within further period of six weeks. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is disposed of. December 5, 2025 Ram Murti WRIA No. 14046 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAM MURTI YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench