AQBAL AHMED v. STATE OF U.P. THRU PRIN.SECY.BASIC SHIKSHA LUCKNOW and ORS.
WRIA/6890/2018 · 2025-12-08
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 186526 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 186526 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 6890 of 2018 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State is present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records. December 8, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vidhu Bhushan, Vineeta Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) :
C.S.C., C.B. Singh (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Aqbal Ahmed .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy.Basic Shiksha Lucknow And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench