SACHIN KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
/12191/2025 · 2025-12-09
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 186516 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 186516 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12191 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record. Despite service of notice, no one appeared on behalf of the complainant. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.380 of 2025, under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(1), 351(3) of BNS; Section 5L/6 of POCSO Act and Section 3(2)V, 3(2)VA of SC/ST Act, Police Station Jalalpur, District Ambedkar Nagar. 3. In terms of the FIR, it was alleged that the daughter of the informant aged about 12 years was enticed by some unknown person. In the statement under Section 183 of BNSS, the victim stated that she had gone along with the applicant to Delhi and physical relations were formed and the applicant got her back. 4. The Counsel for the applicant states that earlier also, FIR being Case Crime No.116 of 2025 was lodged, in which, the victim was said to have eloped by the applicant. In the said case, the bail was granted to the applicant on 14.05.2025 and subsequently, the same given has again ran away with the applicant. 4. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer. 5. Considering the fact that the victim did not support the prosecution Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rahul Srivastava, Subham Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Sachin Kumar .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
case and had gone along with the applicant more than one occasion and the fact that the applicant is languishing in jail since 14.10.2025, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. 6.
Let the applicant Sachin Kumar be released on bail in the aforesaid first information report on his furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. December 9, 2025 akverma BAIL No. 12191 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench