Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 186513 (ALL)

SONALI PAL @ SONALI YADAV AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME CIVIL SECRT. LKO. AND OTHERS

CRLP/4176/2024 · 2025-11-15

Rajnish Kumar, Zafeer Ahmad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 4176 of 2024 CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 4177 of 2024 HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 202 of 2024 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J. HON'BLE ZAFEER AHMAD, J. 1. Both the aforesaid petitions have been filed challenging one and the same FIR i.e. FIR/Case Crime No. 0037 of 2024 under Sections 498A, 308, 313, 323, 504 IPC and Section 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, lodged at Police Station Manak Nagar, District Lucknow against the petitioners of both the petitions. However, Habeas Corpus Petition was filed for a direction to produce the detenue i.e. the minor child through his father Suraj Yadav. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sant Vijay Singh, Dhirendra Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sant Vijay Singh, Dhirendra Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Jamal Ahamad Khan Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sant Vijay Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Sonali Pal @ Sonali Yadav And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Civil Secrt. Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Suraj Pal @ Suraj Yadav And Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko And Others .....Respondent(s) Baby (Minor) Thru. Natural Guardian His Father Suraj Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) 2. Learned AGA on the basis of instructions dated 26.5.2025 received from Sri Gyaneshwar Singh, Sub-Inspector, P.S. Manak Nagar, Lucknow, a copy of which has been produced before this Court and taken on record, submits that Final Report dated 21.5.2025 was forwarded as the matter was settled by the parties before the Mediation and Conciliation Center of this Court and the informant also does not wish to pursue the prosecution, therefore, these petitions have rendered infructuous, which could not be disputed by learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Dhirendra Pratap Singh. 3. All the three petitions are dismissed accordingly. November 15, 2025 Fahim/- CRLP No. 4176 of 2024 2 (Zafeer Ahmad,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHD FAHIM AKHTAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench