HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 1604 of 2024 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Saharsh Srivastava, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State and Mr. Krishana Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the respondents nos. 2 to 4. With the consent of learned counsels appearing for the contesting parties, the writ petition is finally being decided. There is consensus in the Bar that the matter in issue is squarely covered by judgement of this Court dated 10.3.2025 passed in Writ A No. 6187 of 2024 in re: Jitendra Kandwal vs State of U.P. and others, a copy of which is annexure 2 to the writ petition. Considering the aforesaid consensus, the writ petition is allowed. It is provided that the petitioner would be entitled for benefit of the judgement of this Court in the case of Jitendra Kandwal(supra). December 9, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Alok Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Krishana Kumar Singh, Rishabh Tripathi, Aditya Mohan (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Vinod Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Forest Deptt. Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench