112 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: 30.07.2025 CWP-2457-2025 H.C.SHARMA ... PETITIONER VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS .. RESPONDENTS CWP-5243-2025 AJAY SHARMA ... PETITIONER VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS .. RESPONDENTS CWP-621-2025 RANDHIR SINGH ... PETITIONER VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS .. RESPONDENTS CWP-7785-2025 ROHIT ... PETITIONER VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS .. RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHIT KAPOOR Present: Mr. R.K.Handa, Advocate, Ms. Gauri Handa, Advocate, Mr. Dharambir Bhargav, Advocate, and Mr. Kulwinder Bhargav, Advocate, for the petitioner in CWP-2457-2025. Mr. R.D.Yadav, Advocate, for the petitioner in CWP-621-2025. Mr. Rajiv Shrama (Raju), Advocate, for the petitioner in CWP-5243-2025. Mr. Navnit Sharma, Advocate for Mr. R.S.Dhull, Advocate, for the petitioner in CWP-7785-2025. Mr. Piyush Khanna, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. SMRITI 2025.08.05 11:01 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment CWP-2457-2025 & other connected cases -2- Mr. Prince Singh, Advocate, for respondents no. 2 to 4 in CWP-2457-2025. Mr. C.R.Dahiya, Advocate for respondent No. 4 in CWP-621-2025. Ms. Dheerja, Advocate, for respondent No. 2 in CWP-621-2025. **** ROHIT KAPOOR , J. (ORAL) 1. Learned State counsel has supplied the copy of Litigation Policy dated 11.07.2025 in Court today and the same is taken on record. He draws the attention of the Court to Clause 5 (B) of the Litigation Policy which provides detailed mechanism of Grievance Redressal System. He submits that in view thereof, the petitioners have an effective alternate remedy and they should be relegated to the same. 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners do not controvert the said position, however, they contend that the issue of limitation, if any, should not be taken against the petitioners on account of the fact that the petitioners had already approached this Court by way of filing the instant writ petition. 3. The said prayer is not opposed by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents. 4. In view thereof, the present petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to raise their grievances in consonance with the Litigation Policy dated 11.07.2025. It is expected that the grievance of the petitioners shall be decided by the concerned authorities as expeditiously as possible. 5. Disposed of in the aforesaid terms. 30.07.2025 (ROHIT KAPOOR) smriti JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No SMRITI 2025.08.05 11:01 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment