BRIJESH YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. THE PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
ABAIL/1260/2025 · 2025-11-15
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 186458 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 186458 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 1260 of 2025
. Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant; learned AGA for the State and perused the records. Sri Girish Chandra Verma appears for the informant.
2. The present application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. has been filed seeking anticipatory bail apprehending arrest in FIR No.60 of 2023 under sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 323, 324, 307, 308, 447, 34 IPC, P.S. Raje Sultanpur, District Ambedkar Nagar.
3. In terms of the FIR, allegations were levelled that on 19.02.2023, on account of a dispute, all the accused who are twenty in number armed with country-made pistol and other weapons, hit the one of deceased with a firearm weapon, which resulted in his death. The applicant was not named in the FIR. Subsequently, he has been linked with the offence based upon the CDR Location. The postmortem report on record indicates the cause of death as firearm injury.
4. Considering the nature of the allegations, no good ground of anticipatory bail is made out. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rama Niwas Pathak Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Brijesh Yadav .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. The Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
5. The anticipatory bail application is rejected.
6. The applicant however would be at liberty to take such recourse as are available under the BNS for protection of his rights. November 15, 2025 VNP/- ABAIL No. 1260 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench