PHOOL CHANDRA TRIPATHI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. AGRICULTURAL EDUCATION RESEARCH AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/14854/2025 · 2025-12-19
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 186455 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 186455 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14854 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Prashant Kumar Singh,
learned counsel for the respondent-university, Shri R.S. Tiwari, learned Standing Counsel for the State.
2. The present petition has been filed with the following prayer:
"i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding/directing the opposite parties to revise the pension of the petitioner and pay the arrears of revised gratuity and pension, in pursuance of the order dated 20.9.2024 passed by opposite party No.3, contained in Annexure No. 1 to the writ petition. ii) Issue any other appropriate order or direction deemed just and proper in the circumstances of the case. iii) Allow the writ petition with costs."
3. After arguing at length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the ends of justice would sub-serve if, this Court directs the respondent no.3 to consider and decide representation dated 06.11.2025 moved by the petitioner, within the time fixed by this Court.
4. Learned counsel for the respondents has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
5. Be that as it may, without entering into merits of the issue, I hereby dispose off directed the respondent no.3- Director (Administration), Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashok Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Prashant Kumar Singh Phool Chandra Tripathi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Agricultural Education Research And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
Acharya Narendra Dev Univesity of Agriculture & Technology Kumarganj, Ayodhya, UP to consider and dispose of the representation dated 06.11.2025 moved by the petitioner, by a speaking and reasoned
order in accordance with law after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, if it is so required, with expedition preferably, within a further period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and the decision thereof shall be intimated to the petitioner, forthwith.
December 19, 2025 V. Sinha WRIA No. 14854 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench