ALI AKBAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO.
BAIL/11427/2025 · 2025-11-20
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 186436 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 186436 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11427 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.
2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.346 of 2025, under sections 105, 110, 3 (5) of BNS, registered at Police Station Gudamba, District Lucknow.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that the co-accused person Shoeb with the same allegations has been enlarged on bail vide order dated 20.11.2025 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail application No.10475 of 2025.
4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.
5. Considering that the nature of allegations against the applicant to be similar as of co-accused who has been enlarged on bail, on the same reasoning without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 09.9.2025 and has no criminal history, is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the bail application is allowed.
6. Let the applicant Ali Akbar son of Ayoob be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 20, 2025 mks Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ram Karan Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Ali Akbar .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- MANISH SAXENA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench