Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH,
SHIMLA
CWP No. 10512/2025
Decided on: 02.07.2025 Amarjeet Singh
…Petitioner
Versus HRTC & Anr.
.…Respondents. ………………………………………………………………………………. Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner:
Ms. Rinkle, Advocate.
For the respondents: Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua , J
Notice. Mr. Raman Jamalta, learned counsel, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.
2.
This writ petition has been filed for the grant of following substantive reliefs: -
“(i) That a writ in the nature of mandamus may kindly be issued directing Respondent Corporation regularize services of the petitioner from his initial date of appointment and treat petitioner as appointee on regular appointee with all consequential benefits in the interest of justice. (ii) That or in alternative, the respondent corporation may kindly be directed to regularize the services of petitioners immediately after one year, by modifying regularization order Annexure P-2, with all consequential benefits in view of judgment by this Hon'ble Court in case CWPOA No. 2343 of 2020 titled as Vikram Singh and others versus HRTC.”
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the issue involved and the reliefs prayed for by the petitioner have already been adjudicated in Vikram Singh Vs. Himachal Road Transport Corporation2. Learned counsel further submitted that the petitioner would be content, if the case of the petitioner, is considered by the respondents, in light of the aforesaid judgment within a time- bound schedule. Learned counsel for the respondents has no objection to this prayer.
4.
Having regard to above submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, the instant petition is disposed of by directing the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner in light of the aforesaid judgment and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. The decision so arrived at, shall be communicated to the petitioner.
Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also to stand disposed of.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
Judge 2nd July, 2025(rohit)
2 1CWPOA No. 2343 of 2020 decided on 09.11.2023.