[2025:RJ-JP:5538] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 3724/2021 Himanshu Rajawat Son Of Shri Chandraveer Singh, Aged About 24 Years, Resident Of H.no. 260, Radha Vilas, Udaipur House, Near Ful Bihari Temple, Main Road, Patanpole, Kota Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. 2. Upendra Singh Son Of Shri Mohan Singh, Aged About 55 Years, Resident Of Near Ful Bihari Temple, Main Road, Patanpole, Kota, Rajasthan. ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 3718/2021 1. Chandraveer Singh Son Of Late Shri Mohan Singh, Resident Of Radhavilas, Udaipur House, Near Ful Bihari Ji Temple, Patanpole, Main Road, Police Station Kaithunipole, Kota (Raj). 2. Smt. Manjubala W/o Chandraveer Singh, Resident Of Radhavilas, Udaipur House, Near Ful Bihari Ji Temple, Patanpole, Main Road, Police Station Kaithunipole, Kota (Raj). 3. Himanshu Singh Rajawat Son Of Chandraveer Singh, Resident Of Radhavilas, Udaipur House, Near Ful Bihari Ji Temple, Patanpole, Main Road, Police Station Kaithunipole, Kota (Raj). ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. 2. Sho, Police Station Kaithunipole, Kota. 3. Upendra Singh Son Of Shri Mohan Singh, Resident Of Near Radhavilas, Udaipur House, Near Ful Bihari Temple, Patanpole, Kota City, Kota (Raj). 4. Smt. Chintamani W/o Upendra Singh, Resident Of Near Radhavilas, Udaipur House, Near Ful Bihari Temple, Patanpole, Kota City, Kota (Raj). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Garima Yadav on behalf of Mr. Surendra Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia, PP [2025:RJ-JP:5538] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-3724/2021] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 07/02/2025 1. Both the present criminal misc. petitions have been filed by the petitioners with a challenge to order dated 16.03.2020, passed by the Court of learned Additional District Magistrate (City), Kota whereby the petitioners were bound to maintain peace, in view of the proceedings under Section 107 & 116(3) of Cr.P.C. for a period of six months. Against the said order, criminal revision petitions were filed by the petitioners, which have also been dismissed vide separate orders dated 17.03.2021. 2. Both the present petitions are pending since 2021 and there is no interim order, which goes to show that the impugned order dated 16.03.2020 has already been executed. With a lapse of time, both the present misc. petitions have rendered infructuous. 3. Accordingly, the present criminal misc. petitions are dismissed as rendered infructuous. 4. However, it is observed that the impugned orders shall not cause any harm to the petitioners in any manner in future. 5. Stay applications also stand disposed of. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. 6. Registry is directed to place a copy of this order in connected file. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /36-37