VEERU PASI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME U.P. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
/12182/2025 · 2025-12-09
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 186405 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 186405 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12182 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record. Despite service of notice, no one appeared on behalf of the complainant.
2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.102 of 2025, under Sections 137(2), 87, 64B of BNS and Section 3/4 of POCSO Act, Police Station Fursatganj, District Amethi.
3. In terms of the FIR, it was alleged that the daughter of the informant aged about 16 years was enticed by the applicant. Subsequently, in the statements under Sections 180 and 183 of BNSS, the victim did not support the prosecution case and stated that she wanted to marry him. The medical on record does not corroborate the allegation. There is no definite document with regard to the exact age of the victim.
4. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer.
5. Considering the two statements of the victim not supporting the prosecution case and the fact that the applicant has no criminal antecedents and is languishing in jail since 15.09.2025, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed.
6. Let the applicant Veeru Pasi be released on bail in the aforesaid first Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Dilip Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Veeru Pasi .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
information report on his furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. December 9, 2025 akverma BAIL No. 12182 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench