MOHD. ARSHAD AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P.THRU SECY.BASIC EDU. CIVIL SECTT.LUCKNOW and ORS.
WRIA/20364/2016 · 2025-12-09
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 186403 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 186403 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 20364 of 2016 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioners to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State and Sri Vijay Singh, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 3 are present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records. December 9, 2025 AKS Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Himanshu Raghave, Durga Prasad Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Ajay Kumar, Amrendra Nath Tripathi, M.M. Asthana (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Mohd. Arshad And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P.Thru Secy.Basic Edu. Civil Sectt.Lucknow And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench